Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Iowa » Supreme Court » 2006 » STATE OF IOWA vs. SANDRA JOY STELLA LECKINGTON
STATE OF IOWA vs. SANDRA JOY STELLA LECKINGTON
State: Iowa
Court: Supreme Court
Docket No: No. 20 / 04-1368
Case Date: 04/28/2006
Preview:IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 20 / 04-1368 Filed April 28, 2006 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. SANDRA JOY STELLA LECKINGTON, Appellant. ________________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Bobbi M. Alpers, Judge.

Defendant appeals her conviction for neglect of a dependent, child endangerment resulting in serious injury, and providing alcohol to a minor. AFFIRMED.

Penelope R. Souhrada, Davenport, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kristin Guddall, Assistant Attorney General, William E. Davis, County Attorney, and Julie A. Walton, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.

2 STREIT, Justice. When children fail in their own judgment, responsible adults must step up. A mother made some horrible decisions concerning her son's drunken friend, almost costing him his life. A jury convicted the

defendant, Sandra Leckington, of neglect of a dependent child, child endangerment resulting in serious injury, and providing alcohol to a minor. On appeal, Leckington contends there was insufficient evidence to prove key elements of the neglect and child endangerment charges. In addition, she contends the trial court abused its discretion by making her sentences for the neglect and child endangerment charges

consecutive. She also argues her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress and for making misstatements during his motion for judgment of acquittal. Because we find there was sufficient evidence to support the verdict, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing, and her trial counsel's misstatements during his motion for judgment of acquittal did not amount to ineffective assistance, we affirm. However, the question of whether her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress is preserved for postconviction proceedings. I. Facts and Prior Proceedings

On December 17, 2003, Sandra Leckington purchased a halfgallon of vodka to help her eighteen-year-old son, Curtis Jenkins, "celebrate" his impending stint of probation. Jenkins and a group of

friends procured more vodka and alcohol so that they could make "jungle juice" 1 for a party at Dominic Major's apartment.
1According

to Wikipedia,

[j]ungle juice is the name given to a mix of liquor that is usually served for the sole purpose of becoming intoxicated . . . . Often, it may include leftovers of many liquors along with a mixer (juice, cola, etc.) to make the

3 Eleven days later, Sandra allowed her younger son, Shawn Yuille, to have his friend, Travis Talbot, spend the night at their home. The next day, the two thirteen-year-old boys left the Leckington home and went a few houses down the block to Travis's home so that Travis could check in with his mother. restaurant. The two boys then joined Sandra for lunch at a

After lunch, the boys told Sandra they were going to ride

their bicycles around the neighborhood. The boys went down the block to the apartment of Dominic Major. Travis and Shawn proceeded to play video games and drink the leftover vodka. Travis consumed three to four glasses of vodka and started to become a problem for Major. At 2:07 p.m., Major called Sandra and told her to pick up the two boys because Travis was "pretty trashed." On the way to Major's

apartment, Sandra picked up her husband, Mark Leckington, from the local convenience store. By the time Sandra arrived at the apartment, Travis was so intoxicated he was having difficulty standing and walking. At one point, he fell and hit his head on one of the pillars of the apartment building. Major carried Travis from the apartment building to the car. Once Travis was placed in the back seat of the car, he

immediately slumped over. One witness thought Travis was unconscious when he was placed in the car. Mark asked whether Travis had been drinking, but Sandra, even though she had been told Travis was "pretty trashed," told Mark that Travis had not been drinking. Mark then asked Shawn what was wrong with Travis. Shawn told him that they had been wrestling around and Travis hit his head. Sandra drove around the

block to the Leckington home. According to Sandra, Mark, and Shawn, ________________________
clash of liquors easier to swallow . . . . Jungle juice made with Kool-Aid is called "Hunch Punch." Jungle juice, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jungle_Juice (last visited March 28, 2006).

4 Travis walked, unaided, out of the car and into the home. After the boys entered the home, Sandra and Mark left to run errands. Once inside the Leckington home, Travis collapsed on the kitchen floor. Shawn tried to revive Travis by pouring milk down his throat.

When this did not work, he went back outside and found some friends to help carry Travis upstairs to the bathtub. The boys then ran cold water on Travis in hopes of reviving him. Travis did not wake up, and he began to foam at the mouth. Approximately an hour after they left the boys at their home, Sandra and Mark returned home. Mark went to a room in the back of the home. One of the children in the house told Sandra that Travis was "dead" and lying in the bathtub. Sandra "freaked out." She told the boys they had to get Travis out of the bathtub and out of the house. While moving Travis out of the tub, Sandra proclaimed "You know how much trouble I'm going to get into, this little f***er had to drink alcohol, I'm not going to jail for this motherf***ing bastard." She helped drag Travis down the stairs, but the boys refused to help her put Travis outside in the cold December air. Sandra went to Mark and told him about Travis. Mark told her to call Travis's mom. Travis's mother told Sandra to call 911. When the paramedics arrived, Travis had a very weak pulse, his mouth was clenched shut, he was extremely cold, his skin had a blue coloring, and his clothing was wet. Travis was rushed to University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics in Iowa City via helicopter and placed in pediatric intensive care. Travis regained consciousness fourteen hours later. A doctor testified that his blood alcohol content was approximately .3 when he reached the hospital, and that he was at risk of death from the high level of alcohol in his blood.

5 The State filed a multi-count trial information charging Sandra Leckington with the offenses of child endangerment resulting in serious injury in violation of Iowa Code section 726.6(4) (2003), neglect of a dependent person in violation of section 726.3, and providing alcohol to a minor resulting in serious injury in violation of section 123.47(5). Sandra Leckington was convicted of child endangerment resulting in serious injury, neglect of a dependent person, and the lesser offense of providing alcohol to a minor. The court sentenced her to consecutive

terms of ten years for the child endangerment and neglect charges and a one-year, concurrent term for providing alcohol to a minor. II. A. Issues Sufficient Evidence

Sandra challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting various elements of her convictions for child endangerment resulting in serious injury and neglect of a dependent person. In regards to the

child-endangerment-resulting-in-serious-injury conviction, she claims there was insufficient evidence to prove: (1) she had "control" or

"custody" of Travis; (2) she knowingly acted in a manner which created risk to Travis; (3) she willfully deprived Travis of health care or supervision; or (4) her actions resulted in serious injury to Travis. In

regards to the neglect-of-a-dependent conviction, she claims there was insufficient evidence to prove she had custody of Travis or that she knowingly or recklessly exposed Travis to a hazard or danger from which he could not reasonably be expected to protect himself. We will discuss each argument in turn. 1. Standard of Review

The standard of review for insufficient-evidence claims is for correction of errors of law. State v. Petithory, 702 N.W.2d 854, 856 (Iowa

6 2005). The jury's findings of guilt are binding on appeal if the findings are supported by substantial evidence. State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d

374, 377 (Iowa 1998). Substantial evidence is evidence that could convince a rational trier of fact that a defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. When reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, including legitimate inferences and presumptions which may fairly and reasonably be deduced from the evidence in the record. Casady, 597 N.W.2d 801, 804 (Iowa 1999). 2. Child Endangerment Resulting in Serious Injury State v.

In order to convict Sandra of child endangerment resulting in serious injury, the jury had to find: (1) Sandra was the parent, guardian, or person having custody or control over Travis; (2) Travis was under the age of fourteen; (3) Sandra knowingly acted in a manner creating a substantial risk to Travis's physical, mental, or emotional health or safety, or Sandra willfully deprived Travis of necessary health care or supervision appropriate to Travis's age when she was reasonably able to make the necessary provisions and which deprivation substantially harmed Travis's physical, mental, or emotional health; and (4) Sandra's act resulted in serious injury to Travis. See Iowa Code
Download STATE OF IOWA vs. SANDRA JOY STELLA LECKINGTON.pdf

Iowa Law

Iowa State Laws
    > Iowa Gun Laws
    > Iowa Statutes
Iowa Tax
    > Iowa State Tax
Iowa Court
    > Iowa Courts
Iowa Labor Laws
Iowa Agencies

Comments

Tips