Preview:

08/31/2007 "See News Release 051 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 07-OB-0929 IN RE: CLARK C. ROY

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT PER CURIAM*
In 2004, petitioner, Clark C. Roy, was suspended from the practice of law for three years, retroactive to the date of his interim suspension, pursuant to a petition for consent discipline. In re: Roy, 04-0635 (La. 4/30/04), 872 So. 2d 464. The disciplinary proceeding stemmed from several complaints against petitioner, generally alleging that he neglected his clients' legal matters, failed to communicate with his clients, misled his clients concerning the status of their legal matters, and failed to refund unearned fees. This misconduct was directly attributable to petitioner's alcoholism. Following his suspension, petitioner successfully completed an inpatient substance abuse treatment program and made substantial progress in maintaining his sobriety. Thereafter, petitioner filed an application for reinstatement, asserting that he has complied with the reinstatement criteria set forth in Supreme Court Rule XIX,

Download 2007-OB-0929 IN RE: CLARK C. ROY.pdf

Louisiana Law