Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Louisiana » Louisiana Supreme Court » 2012 » 2011-C-2132 c/w 2011-C-2139 c/w 2011-C-2142 JOE OLIVER, ET AL. v. MAGNOLIA CLINIC, ET AL.
2011-C-2132 c/w 2011-C-2139 c/w 2011-C-2142 JOE OLIVER, ET AL. v. MAGNOLIA CLINIC, ET AL.
State: Louisiana
Court: Supreme Court
Docket No: 2011-C-2132
Case Date: 01/01/2012
Preview:Supreme Court of Louisiana
FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 13th day of March, 2012, are as follows: NEWS RELEASE #014

CLARK, J.:

2011-C -2132 c/w 2011-C -2139 c/w 2011-C -2142

JOE OLIVER, Calcasieu)

ET

AL.

v.

MAGNOLIA

CLINIC,

ET

AL.

(Parish

of

For the reasons stated herein, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed in part and affirmed in part. The trial court judgment is reinstated in full. REVERSED IN REINSTATED. PART; AFFIRMED IN PART. TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT

JOHNSON, J., concurs in part, dissents in part. VICTORY, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with reasons. KNOLL, J., concurs with reasons in the result.

03/13/12

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA No. 2011-C-2132 CONSOLIDATED WITH No. 2011-C-2139 CONSOLIDATED WITH No. 2011-C-2142 JOE OLIVER, ET AL. VERSUS MAGNOLIA CLINIC, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT, PARISH OF CALCASIEU CLARK, Justice We granted these consolidated writ applications to address the majority opinion of the court of appeal which held the medical malpractice cap enunciated in La.R.S. 40:1299.42(B) is unconstitutional "to the extent it includes nurse practitioners within its ambit." We reiterate our holding in Butler v. Flint Goodrich Hospital of Dillard University, 607 So.2d 517 (La. 1992), cert denied, 508 U.S. 909, 113 S.Ct. 2338, 124 L.Ed.2d 249 (1993), decreeing the cap constitutional. Finding the cap to be applicable to all qualified healthcare providers under the Medical Malpractice Act, including nurse practitioners, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeal in this respect. Additionally, we address two other assignments of error asserted by the Louisiana Patients' Compensation Fund and affirm these portions of the court of appeal judgment. The effect of our holding is to reinstate the trial court judgment in full. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY This case involves a malpractice judgment in favor of Taylor, Joe, and Helena

Oliver against a nurse practitioner, Nurse Susan Duhon, her insurer, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, the clinic she owned and operated, The Magnolia Clinic, and the Louisiana Patients' Compensation Fund ("PCF"). Facts in Malpractice Case The underlying facts of the case are as follows: Taylor Oliver was born to Joe and Helena Oliver on September 5, 2000. Shortly after birth, she was brought to The Magnolia Clinic and treated by Nurse Duhon exclusively. Over the next year, Taylor visited Nurse Duhon thirty-two times, presenting with symptoms including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, bruising, and infections. Ultimately, her condition was later diagnosed by other physicians as neuroblastoma, a form of cancer that develops from nerve cells. Taylor now suffers from severe bone loss and muscle deterioration, loss of sight, and severe cognitive disabilities. The Olivers sued Nurse Duhon for malpractice, alleging Taylor's delayed diagnosis and treatment caused the severity of her injuries.1 On June 8, 2007, a jury heard the matter and returned a verdict in favor of the Olivers in the amount of approximately ten million dollars.2 On June 29, 2007, the Olivers filed a Motion to Stay Judgment and a Petition for Declaratory Judgment, contending the provision of the Louisiana Medical Malpractice Act ("MMA") that limits the recovery of medical malpractice damages, La.R.S. 40:1299.42(B), is unconstitutional.3 On July 30, 2007, the State of Louisiana intervened to defend the statute being challenged. A hearing

Nurse Duhon selected Dr. Jennette Bergstedt as her consulting physician as required by law. Dr. Bergstedt was additionally named as a defendant in the instant suit but was later dismissed. The award consisted of $6,000,000.00 in general damages, $629,728.24 in past medical expenses, and $3,358,828.00 in future medical expenses. The jury awarded loss of consortium awards to Joe Oliver and Helena Oliver in the amounts of $33,000.00 and $200,000.00, respectively. The Olivers asserted the statute violated the following provisions of the Louisiana Constitution: Article I,
Download 2011-C-2132 c/w 2011-C-2139 c/w 2011-C-2142 JOE OLIVER, ET AL. v. MAGNOLIA CLINI

Louisiana Law

Louisiana State Laws
Louisiana Tax
Louisiana Labor Laws
Louisiana Agencies
    > Louisiana DMV

Comments

Tips