Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Louisiana » Court of Appeals » 2006 » CLARENCE BUCKLEY VS MS. PRISCILLA PITRE, RECORDS ANALYST, ALLEN CORRECTIONAL CENTER; RICHARD STALDER, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONS AND TERRY TERRELL, WARDEN, ALLEN CORRECTION
CLARENCE BUCKLEY VS MS. PRISCILLA PITRE, RECORDS ANALYST, ALLEN CORRECTIONAL CENTER; RICHARD STALDER, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONS AND TERRY TERRELL, WARDEN, ALLEN CORRECTION
State: Louisiana
Court: Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Clerk
Docket No: 2006CA0130
Case Date: 12/01/2006
Plaintiff: CLARENCE BUCKLEY
Defendant: MS. PRISCILLA PITRE, RECORDS ANALYST, ALLEN CORRECTIONAL CENTER; RICHARD STALDER, SECRETARY, DEPAR
Preview:NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST CIRCUIT

NUMBER 2006 CA 0130

CLARENCE BUCKLEY
VERSUS

JW

MS PRISCILLA PITRE RECORDS ANALYST ALC RICHARD L STALDER SECRETARY DPS
TERRY TERRELL WARDEN ALC

C

1f

Judgment Rendered

December 28 2006

Appealed from

the

Nineteenth Judicial District Court
In and for the Parish of East Baton

Rouge Louisiana

Trial Court Number 534 889 Honorable Curtis A

Calloway Judge

Clarence Buckley Kinder LA William L Kline
Baton

In

Proper

Person

Plaintiff

Appellant

Attorney for
Defendant

Rouge

LA

Appellee

State Department of Public Safety Corrections

BEFORE

KUHN GAIDRY AND WELCH JJ

WELCH J

Plaintiff Appellant inmate Clarence Buckley
court judgment

seeks review of the district

adopting
s

the screening recommendation of the Commissioner and
on

dismissing Buckley

claims without service of action

the Department

as

frivolous for

failing to

state

a cause

or

cognizable

claim for which relief is available in
La R S 15 1178 D

accordance with the Case law

screening requirements

precedent and statutory authority clearly control
no more

the

disposition of

this

case

and the issues raised involve

than

an

application of well settled
s

rules to recurring fact situations

The August 23 2005 Commissioner
court

Screening judgment
an

report

adopted by the district

in

its

September 13

2005

thoroughly discusses the factual and procedural background and provides
excellent analysis of the applicable law

supporting that
s

decision

Accordingly
Rule 2 16 2A 2
4

we

affirm the district court
5

judgment in accordance with

and

6

of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of assessed to the plaintiff appellant

Appeal All

costs

of this

appeal

are

AFFIRMED

2

Download 2006CA0130Dec2006.Not.12.pdf

Louisiana Law

Louisiana State Laws
Louisiana Tax
Louisiana Labor Laws
Louisiana Agencies
    > Louisiana DMV

Comments

Tips