Preview:

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT

I
yVl

NO 2006 CU 1495

JEFFREY P CEDOTAL VERSUS

FRANCES WALKER CEDOTAL
Judgment
Rendered December 28 2006

On

Appeal

from the

32nd Judicial District COUli in and for the Parish of Tenebonne State of Louisiana Trial Court No 131 504 Honorable Randall Bethancourt Judge Presiding

Diana M Sanders Raceland La
Jeni G Smitko Houma La

Counsel for Defendant

Appellant

Frances Walker Cedotal Robichaux

Plaintiff Appellee

Jeffrey

P Cedotal

BEFORE

CARTER C J

WHIPPLE AND MCDONALD n

CARTER C J

A mother

appeals

the trial court

judgment modifying

the

original

stipulated custody agreement
the parents
a seven

to

a

fifty fifty sharing of physical custody by
as

seven

alTangement and removing the mother

the sole

domiciliary parent naming the parents as joint domicilimy parents Every child custody
of facts and circumstances 880 So 2d 20 23
case

must

be reviewed within its
03 2676 La

own

peculiar
14 5

set

RJ

v

MJ

App

1 Cir

04

The trial court

s

factual determinations cannot be set unless those findings
1 Cir
are

aside in the absence of manifest
Elliott
v

elTor or

clearly

wrong 226

Elliott 05 0181

La

App

11 5

05

916 So 2d 221 Furthermore the

writ denied

05 1547

La

12 7

05

905 So 2d 293

trial court

s

determination in child custody matters is entitled to great
on

weight

and will not be reversed
shown RJ

appeal

unless

an

abuse of discretion is clearly

880 So 2d at 23

Following

a

thorough review

we

conclude the record does not
or

demonstrate that the decision of the trial court is clearly wrong

that the

trial cOUli abused its discretion in resolving this matter Thus in accordance
with UnifOlnl Rules Courts of

Appeal

Rule 2 16 2A 5

6

7

and

8

we

affirm the judgment below by summmy disposition and

assess

all costs

associated with this Robichaux
AFFIRMED

appeal against appellant

Frances

Walker Cedotal

2



Download 2006CU1495Dec2006Not.10.pdf

Louisiana Law