Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Maine » Superior Court » 2006 » Bougopoulos VS State of Maine Bd. of Dental Exam'rs
Bougopoulos VS State of Maine Bd. of Dental Exam'rs
State: Maine
Court: Supreme Court
Docket No: CUMap-06-19
Case Date: 12/12/2006
Plaintiff: Bougopoulos
Defendant: State of Maine Bd. of Dental Exam'rs
Preview:STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss. CIVIL ACTION
-6DOCKET NO;

RA~
7
CHRISTOPHER BOUGOPOULOS
I
Plaintiff
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS RULE 80C APPEAL
v.
STATE OF MAINE BOARD OF DENTAL EXAMINERS
Defendant
This case comes before the Court on Bougopoulos~s Motion to Dismiss his 80C appeal without prejudice, and the Board's Motion to Dismiss the appeal with prejudice and with an award of costs.
BACKGROUND
Christopher Bougopoulos ("Bougopoulos"), a licensed dentist in Maine, filed an 80C appeal in this Court in April 2006. Bougopoulos sought review of a March 2006 decision of the State Board of Dental Examiners ("The Board"), which suspended Bougopoulos's dentistry license for 15days, imposed fines, and instituted a five-year period of probation based on its findings that Bougopoulos violated certain standards of practice.
In his appeal, Bougopoulos alleged that he did not receive due process in the months leading up to his hearing in February 2006. The Board, however, contends that Bougopoulos did receive due process and that its decision should be affirmed. After correspondence between attorneys for the parties, Bougopoulos offered to voluntarily dismiss the appeal in return for a meeting with the Board to discuss its hearing processes. The Board rejected this proposal and began preparing to fully and vigorously defend the appeal. Although neither party has submitted a brief1 per Rule 80C, The Board, as required by the rule, did order hearing transcripts and other materials to be included in the record it intended to file with hs Court. Bougopoulos later moved to dismiss his appeal without prejudice, citing financial concerns. The Board moved to dismiss the appeal with prejudice, also contending that Bougopoulos should reimburse the Board for the costs of preparing the re~ord.~
DISCUSSION
1. Standard of Review for Voluntarv Dismissal.
The primary issue in hs case is whether Bougopoulos is entitled to a voluntary dismissal without prejudice. Voluntary dismissal of a civil action is governed by M.R. Civ. P. 41(a)(l). A plaintiff can dismiss hs or her own action without approval of the court, provided that dismissal occurs before the filing of the answer or that the parties have stipulated to dismissal. Id. If those conditions have not been met, however, the court may order dismissal "upon such terms and conditions" as it sees fit; such dismissals are without prejudice, unless the court orders otherwise. M.R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2).
Here, Bougopoulos provided a stipulation of dismissal to the Board, whch would not stipulate because the parties disagree about whether the dismissal should be with or without prejudice, and about who should pay the costs of compiling the record. Tlus Court must therefore determine whether
Bougopoulos's Motion to Enlarge the time for filing his brief was granted by this Court pending resolution of these motions. 2 The Board indicates that the total cost of preparing the record was $4,246.00.
dismissal is warranted, and with what ramifications. This is a purely discretionary decision. VAS, LLC v. DavricMe. Corp., PORSC-CV-2003-661 (Me. Super. Ct. Cum. Cty., Jul. 7,2004) (Crowley, J.).
As indicated above, the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure presume that voluntary dismissals are without prejudice. In this instance, however, the Board prepared the appellate record and was ready to defend the appeal. Bougopoulos had an opportunity to file a brief and fully pursue his appeal, but elected not to do so. Given this, he will not be permitted to re-file tlus appeal, which is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
While the Court appreciates the Board's concern about having incurred the costs of preparing the record, such costs are typically borne by the agency. No costs for amassing the record will be awarded to the Board.
The entry is:
Plaintiff's motion to dismiss his 80C appeal without prejudice is
DENIED. Defendant's motion to dismiss with prejudice is
GRANTED, with no costs.

DATE: ' ~ustik, Superior Court
COURTS
)d County
)x 287 e 041 12-0287
F COURTS
~ndCounty
30x 287 ne 041 12-0287
JENNIFER RIGGLE ESQ
/
9'

93 EXCHANGE STREET
PORTLAND ME 04101

DENNIS SMITH AAG 6 STATE HOUSE STATION AUGUSTA ME 04333
Download CUMap-06-19.pdf

Maine Law

Maine State Laws
    > Maine Statute
Maine State
Maine Tax
    > Maine State Tax
Maine Labor Laws

Comments

Tips