Preview:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE RANDAL S. HORR, PLAINTIFF v. STATE OF MAINE,
ET AL.,

DEFENDANTS

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CIVIL NO. 2:11-CV-369-DBH

ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On November 8, 2011, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with a copy to the plaintiff, her Recommended Decision. The time within which to file objections expired on November 25, 2011, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the plaintiff that failure to object

would waive his right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety for failure to state a federal claim. SO ORDERED. DATED THIS 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2011 /S/D. BROCK HORNBY D. BROCK HORNBY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE (PORTLAND) CIVIL DOCKET NO. 2:11CV369 (DBH) Randal S. Horr, Plaintiff v. State of Maine, Cumberland County Jail, Maine Department Of Corrections, Commissioner Martin E. Magnusson, Correctional Medical Services, Defendants Represented By Represented By Randal S. Horr, Pro Se 1429 Congress Street # 2 Portland, ME 04102

2



Download DBH_12022011_2-11cv369_HORR_V_MAINE.pdf

Maine Law