Preview:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

PAUL H. LAMARCHE, Plaintiff v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff v. LORNA ARMESTO, Third-Party Defendant

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Civil No. 01-123-B-H

RECOMMENDED DECISION ON METROPOLITAN'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ORDER ON METROPOLITAN'S MOTION FOR EXCLUSION OF EXPERT TESTIMONY

Plaintiff Paul LaMarche filed suit in this Court against Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, seeking the proceeds of two life insurance annuity contracts Metropolitan issued to his deceased wife and additional remedies based on various legal and equitable theories. Because Metropolitan was already defending a claim to recover the same proceeds brought by Third-Party Defendant Lorna Armesto in New York, Metropolitan haled Armesto into this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

Download MJK_11062002_1-01cv123_LaMarche_v_MetroLife_AFFIRMED_12162002.pdf

Maine Law