State v. Jordan Download as PDF Wordperfect 3 Back to Opinions page MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 1997 ME 101 Docket: Cum-96-108 Argued : February 7, 1997 Decided: May 15, 1997 Panel: ROBERTS, and GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA and LIPEZ, JJ.
STATE OF MAINE v. GEORGE JORDAN
CLIFFORD, J. [¶1] George Jordan appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Cole, C.J.) following a jury verdict finding him guilty of reckless conduct with the use of a dangerous weapon (Class C) in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 211, 1254(2) (1983). Because we agree with Jordan's contention that the trial court erred in permitting testimony of prior bad acts in violation of M.R. Evid. 404(b), we vacate the judgment.{1} [¶2] The record and evidence received at trial reveal the following: Clover Jordan, Jordan's estranged wife, received three harassing phone calls in the early morning hours of April 24, 1994. She reported the calls to the Portland Police and said that she suspected Jordan as the caller. The South Portland Police checked out the location where the phone calls originated, a pay phone at 441 Western Avenue in South Portland. The officers did not observe anyone at the pay phone, but they proceeded to Jordan's home at approximately 2:30 a.m. [¶3] The officers made phone contact with Jordan and also knocked on his door on several occasions. Jordan refused to comply with the officer's requests to open his door and speak with them about the phone calls. Jordan responded to the officer's presence by turning up the music on his stereo. The officers received information that there was an outstanding warrant for his arrest for a failure to appear at a hearing on a charge of carrying a concealed weapon. The officers at the scene then decided, based on a complaint from Jordan's neighbor regarding the loud music, to execute the outstanding arrest warrant. As the officers forcibly entered Jordan's darkened apartment, he was observed pointing a shotgun at one of the officers. Two of the officers fired shots and struck Jordan in the arm. Jordan's shotgun was found to be loaded. [¶4] Jordan was indicted on charges of criminal threatening with the use of a dangerous weapon in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 209, 1252(4) (1983){2} and reckless conduct with the use of a dangerous weapon in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 211, 1252(4) (1983).{3} Prior to the trial, Jordan moved in limine, pursuant to M.R. Crim. P. 12(c), seeking to restrict the testimony of Clover Jordan. Jordan sought to prohibit her from testifying about the three phone calls he allegedly made on April 24, 1994, and the history of his harassment against her, that began in 1993. The court denied Jordan's motion and concluded that the prior bad acts were admissible to prove Jordan's intent, motive, and state of mind as he confronted the officers. [¶5] At the trial, Jordan continued to object to the testimony of Clover who testified about incidents as long as a year and a half before the present charges, when Jordan had harassed her with phone calls, had followed her in a vehicle and attempted to run her off the road, and had sat outside her house in a vehicle watching her home. The court denied Jordan's motion for acquittal at the close of the State's case and at the close of all the evidence. This appeal followed the jury verdict finding Jordan guilty of reckless conduct with the use of a dangerous weapon.{4} [¶6] Evidence of other crimes or wrongs is not admissible to prove the character of a person to show that he acted in conformity therewith. M.R. Evid. 404(b).{5} Nevertheless, such evidence may be admissible if it is "relevant to specified facts and propositions" involved in the case. Field & Murray, Maine Evidence