Preview:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 72 September Term, 1997 ______________________________________ MARCEL BLITZ

v.

BETH ISAAC ADAS ISRAEL CONGREGATION ______________________________________ Bell, C.J. Eldridge Rodowsky Chasanow Raker Wilner *Karwacki, Robert L. (Retired, specially assigned), JJ. ._____________________________________ Opinion by Bell, C.J. ______________________________________

Filed: December 14, 1998 .

The petitioner, Marcel Blitz, has filed Petitioner's Motion For Clarification, requesting this Court to clarify the scope of its decision; to state clearly whether the attorneys' fees contemplated by the term "disbursements" include those "incurred...at the appellate level in connection with confirming and enforcing an arbitration award." The motion was prompted by the respondent taking the position, subsequent to the filing of the opinion in this case, that the opinion addresses only those attorneys' fees that the petitioner incurred in the trial court and not those he incurred during the appeals. That remains the respondent's position. Despite its recognition that this Court determined that the word "disbursements," in the context of Maryland Code (1974, 1995 Repl. Vol.)

Download Blitz v. Beth Isaac.pdf

Maryland Law