Preview:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

THOMAS ATKINS v. WINCHESTER HOMES, et al.

: : : : : : : ORDER

Civil No. CCB-06-278

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Defendant Winchester Homes's motion to dismiss (docket entry no. 5) is Denied as moot; 2. Defendant Weyerhaeuser Corporation's motion to dismiss (docket entry no. 7) is Denied as moot; 3. Defendant Woodrow Gunther's motion to dismiss (docket entry no. 8) is Granted; 4. Defendant Kevin Holmes's motion to dismiss (docket entry no. 10) is Granted; 5. Defendant Corie Jones's motion to dismiss (docket entry no. 11) is Granted; 6. Defendant Larry Freiert, Edward Brooks and Edward Duffy's motion to dismiss (docket entry no. 12) is Denied as moot; 7. Defendant Weyerhaeuser Corporation's motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint (docket entry no. 19) is Granted; 8. Defendant Larry Freiert, Edward Brooks and Edward Duffy's motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint (docket entry no. 22) is Granted as to Freiert and Brooks and Denied in part and Granted in part as to Duffy; 9. Defendant Winchester Homes's motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint

(docket entry no. 23) is Denied in part and Granted in part; 10. Plaintiff's motion to strike defendant's supplemental authority is Denied.

January 17, 2007 Date

/s/ Catherine C. Blake United States District Judge



Download Atkins v. Winchester Homes, et a l. - ORDER.pdf

Maryland Law