Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Maryland » the District of Maryland » 2005 » Hardwire LLC v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Hardwire LLC v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
State: Maryland
Court: Maryland District Court
Case Date: 03/18/2005
Preview:IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Northern Division * HARDWIRE LLC, * Plaintiff, * v. * THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Civil Case No. RDB 04-2524

MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, filed by The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company ("Goodyear" or "Defendant"). The initial Complaint filed by Hardwire LLC ("Hardwire" or "Plaintiff") in the Circuit Court for Worcester County, Maryland, alleged anticipatory breach of contract, requested a declaratory judgment regarding the contract, and specific performance on the contract. Goodyear removed this case based on diversity of citizenship to this Court and, on August 4, 2004, moved to dismiss the case. Hardwire did not respond to the August 4, 2004 Motion to Dismiss, and instead, filed a First Amended Complaint. In addition to the Counts alleged in the initial Complaint, the First Amended Complaint alleges (1) breach of contract, (2) fraud, (3) negligent misrepresentation, and (4) tortious interference with economic advantage. This Court denied Goodyear's initial Motion to Dismiss the initial Complaint without prejudice. Goodyear now moves to dismiss all Counts of Hardwire's First Amended Complaint. Hardwire, with

Goodyear's consent, moved the court for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) and Local Rule 103.6(b) (D. Md. 2004). On October 7, 2004, this Court granted Hardwire's Motion for Leave to Amend and ordered that Goodyear's Motion to Dismiss and Hardwire's Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss, applied to the Second Amended Complaint. Additionally, this Court ordered that Goodyear had the right to file a reply memorandum in response to Hardwire's Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss. The Second Amended Complaint ("the Complaint") deleted paragraph 20 of the First Amended Complaint, which asserted that there was no integration clause in an agreement between the parties that is the subject of this litigation. There were no other changes to the Complaint setting forth the Plaintiff's cause of action. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
Download Hardwire LLC v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co..pdf

Maryland Law

Maryland State Laws
Maryland Court
Maryland Tax
Maryland Labor Laws
Maryland Agencies

Comments

Tips