Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Maryland » the District of Maryland » 2003 » In re: Washington Post Motion to Open Juvenile Detention Hearing (Second Memorandum)
In re: Washington Post Motion to Open Juvenile Detention Hearing (Second Memorandum)
State: Maryland
Court: Maryland District Court
Case Date: 03/12/2003
Preview:IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND IN RE: WASHINGTON POST MOTION TO OPEN JUVENILE DETENTION HEARING, ETC. : : : : : : : SECOND MEMORANDUM AND ORDER UNSEALING CERTAIN MATERIALS In its Order of February 14, 2003, the Court noted that additional hearings had been conducted in United States of America, Plaintiff v. Lee Boyd Malvo, previously known as John Doe, Juvenile, Criminal No. DKC-02-0474, transcripts of which had not been prepared. There being no transcripts, the Court could not determine whether those proceedings, or portions thereof, should be unsealed. Subsequently, the self-styled "Intervenors" requested that transcripts be prepared of hearings conducted on October 24, 2002, October 29, 2002, and November 1, 2002 in Case No. DKC-02-0472. Having now reviewed those transcripts and the "Intervenors" continuing to seek their unsealing, the Court applies the analytical framework set out in the Order of February 14, 2003, and rules as follows: Paper No. 27 Transcript of proceedings on October 24, 2002 Unseal all, except: page 10, line 19 through page 11, line 18; page 42, line 12 through page 43, line 10; page 46, line 25 through page 47, line 1. Unseal all, except: page 22, line 15 through page 39, line 7. Unseal all. MISC. CASE NO. 02-MC-355 (Magistrate Judge Bredar)

Paper No. 28 Transcript of proceedings on October 29, 2002

Paper No. 29 Transcript of proceedings on November 1, 2002

Execution of this Order unsealing transcripts is stayed until March 19, 2003, at noon, to allow Mr. Malvo and his representatives time to offer their specific objections to the release of these transcripts, or portions thereof, by way of a Motion to Reconsider and/or to allow appeal of this Order. Should a Notice of Appeal be filed before March 19, 2003, at noon, then execution is stayed pending resolution of the appeal. SO ORDERED this _______ day of March, 2003.

BY THE COURT:

____________________________________ James K. Bredar United States Magistrate Judge

2

Download In re: Washington Post Motion to Open Juvenile Detention Hearing (Second Memoran

Maryland Law

Maryland State Laws
Maryland Court
Maryland Tax
Maryland Labor Laws
Maryland Agencies

Comments

Tips