Preview:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JOHN ANDREW NOONAN * * * Civil No. JFM-09-1768 * * * ***** MEMORANDUM Plaintiff has instituted this pro se action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Defendants have all filed motions to dismiss. Plaintiff has responded to the motions by filing "motions to dismiss" the defendants' motions to dismiss. Pro se pleadings must, of course, be liberally construed. However, plaintiff has failed to state any facts whatsoever to support the claims he asserts against any of the defendants. Accordingly, defendant's motions will be granted.

Mr. WILLIAM COUPER, PRESIDENT BOA, ET AL.

DATE:

10/23/2009

__/s/___________________ J. Frederick Motz United States District Judge

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JOHN ANDREW NOONAN * * * Civil No. JFM-09-1768 * * * ***** ORDER For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is, this 23rd day of October 2009 ORDERED 1. 2. The motions to dismiss filed by defendants (documents 9 and 13) are granted; and This action is dismissed. __/s/___________________ J. Frederick Motz United States District Judge

Mr. WILLIAM COUPER, PRESIDENT BOA, ET AL.



Download John Andrew Noonan v. Mr. William Couper.pdf

Maryland Law