Preview:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND KENNETH C. ROSSIGNOL, et al. v. : RICHARD VOORHAAR, et al. : MEMORANDUM Before the Court are: Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment on Liability Issues (Paper No. 69); Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Doolan, Long, Merican, Myers, Willenborg, and Young (Paper No. 73); Defendant Fritz's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Paper No. 74); Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Voorhaar, Alioto, and Board of County Commissioners for St. Mary's County ("the County") (Paper No. 75).1 The motions have been exhaustively Upon review of the pleadings : : Civil Action WMN-99-3302

briefed and are ripe for decision.

and applicable case law, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary (Local Rule 105.6) and that: all Defendants will be granted summary judgment as to Counts 1-3, which assert causes of action under 42 U.S.C.

Download Kenneth C. Rossignol v. Richard Voorhaar, et al..pdf

Maryland Law