Preview:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. CHLOE ANN JONES, et al. * * * * * * ***** ORDER For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is Ordered, or Declared and Adjudged that: 1. 2. 3. Plaintiff Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company's motion for summary judgment (No. 7) is granted in part and denied in part; The motion to dismiss (No. 25) by Defendants Chloe Ann Jones and Lateesha Jones is denied; Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company has no duty under Nationwide Policy No.: 52 19 HO 361151 to defend or indemnify Chloe Ann Jones for the claims of Martina Ford, Brandon Williams, a minor, and Naya Williams, a minor, made in the case captioned Martina Ford, et al. v. Baltimore City Department of Social Services, et al., in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Case No.: 24-C-05006657. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company has no duty under Nationwide Policy No.: 52 19 HO 361151 to defend or indemnify Lateesha Jones, also known as and referred to as Latisha Jones, a minor, for the claims of Naya Williams, a minor, made in the case captioned Martina Ford, et al. v. Baltimore City Department of Social Services, et al., in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Case No.: 05-006657. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company has a duty under Nationwide Policy No.: 52 19 HO 361151 to defend Lateesha Jones, also known as and referred to as Latisha Jones, a minor, for the claims of Martina Ford and Brandon Williams, a minor, made in the case captioned Martina Ford, et al. v. Baltimore City Department of Social Services, et al., in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Case No.: 24-C-05-006657. This case is closed.

Civil No. JFM-05-2792

4.

24-C5.

6.

February 15, 2006 Date

/s/ J. Frederick Motz United States District Judge



Download Nationwide Mutual Ins Co v. Jones, et al. - Order.pdf

Maryland Law