Preview:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND STRONGHOLD SECURITY LLC, et al., Plaintiffs v. SECTEK, INC., Defendant : : : : : : : ...o0o...

Civil No. AMD 08-233

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER This diversity case arises from the failed efforts of three entities to secure and perform a government contract to provide security services at Army bases throughout the Eastern United States: plaintiffs Stronghold Security, LLC (Stronghold), and Secureone, Inc. (Secureone), and defendant Sectek, Inc. (SecTek). In a Memorandum Opinion and Order filed on May 24, 2008, I granted in part and denied in part SecTek's motion to dismiss certain counts of the complaint. Thereafter, SecTek impleaded third party defendant Financial Modeling Specialist, Inc. (FMS), which has moved to dismiss the third party complaint or, in the alternative, to transfer the entire case or the third party claims. Specifically, FMS asserts that, in consequence of a written agreement between itself and SecTek, venue as to the third party complaint does not lie in this district and the amended third party complaint should be dismissed. In the alternative, FMS requests that I (1) transfer the entire case, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

Download Stronghold Security LLC v. SecTek, Inc..pdf

Maryland Law