Preview:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND GEORGE R. SYMEONIDIS v. PAXTON CAPITAL GROUP, INC., et al. : : : : : : Civil Action WMN-99-2170

MEMORANDUM Before the Court are Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Paxton Capital Group, Inc., William B. Winters, John Gibson, Robert Plummer, and Michael Winters (hereinafter "the Paxton Defendants"), Paper No. 122, and by Plaintiff, Paper No. 124.1 The motions have been fully Upon review of the

briefed and are ripe for decision.

pleadings and applicable case law, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary (Local Rule 105.6) and that Defendants' motion will be granted, and Plaintiff's motion will be denied. I. BACKGROUND The history of this case is a long and tortuous one. Plaintiff is a former account representative for Defendant Paxton Capital Group, Inc. ("Paxton"), which is in the business of the marketing and sales of residential mortgages.2

A number of other, miscellaneous motions are also pending before the Court. They will be addressed infra. Defendants William B. Winters, John Gibson, Robert Plummer, and Michael Winters are principals of Paxton.
2

1

Although Plaintiff was represented by counsel for approximately the first 15 months of this litigation, he has proceeded on a pro se basis since then. As a pro se litigant,

Plaintiff appears to have devoted himself to pursuing this lawsuit with persistence and determination. Over the past

year and a half, Plaintiff has filed no fewer than 40 discovery-related motions, most of which

Download Symeonidis v. Paxton Capital Group, Inc..pdf

Maryland Law