Preview:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND THOMAS H. KEELING, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMANN & ) GIRARD, a professional corporation, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) MEMORANDUM Pro se plaintiff Thomas Keeling has brought this action against Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann, & Girard ("KMTG") and William Kershaw. Keeling asserts contract and tort claims under California law. Defendants have moved to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). The motion will be granted in part. I. According to Keeling's Complaint, the relevant facts are as follows: In 1994 Keeling began working for KMTG, a law firm, as an associate. In persuading Keeling to work for KMTG, Kershaw, a lawyer and shareholder at KMTG, told Keeling that he would have the opportunity to work on class action litigation. Kershaw also promised Keeling that, for originating and prosecuting class actions, Keeling's compensation would be fair and consistent with other attorneys in class action practice generally. See Complaint

Download Thomas H. Keeling v Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard et al.pdf

Maryland Law