Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Maryland » the District of Maryland » 2002 » Verizon Maryland Inc., F/K/A Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc. v. RCN Telecom Services, Inc.
Verizon Maryland Inc., F/K/A Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc. v. RCN Telecom Services, Inc.
State: Maryland
Court: Maryland District Court
Case Date: 11/19/2002
Preview:IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, NORTHERN DIVISION * VERIZON MARYLAND INC., * f/k/a BELL ATLANTIC-MARYLAND, INC. * Plaintiff, v. RCN TELECOM SERVICES, INC., f/k/a RCN TELECOM SERVICES OF MARYLAND INC., et al., Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CIVIL NO.: S-99-2061

MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiff, Verizon Maryland Inc. ("Verizon"), formerly known as Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc., filed an amended complaint against the defendants alleging that the Public Service Commission of Maryland ("PSC") issued certain orders that violate the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ("the 1996 Act"), Pub. L. 104104, 110 Stat. 56 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 47 U.S.C.). Now before the Court are the motions to dismiss of:

(1) Catherine I. Riley, Claude M. Ligon, J. Joseph Curran III, Gail C. McDonald, and Ronald Guns, all in their official capacities as members of the PSC (collectively, "the commissioners"); (2) Global NAPS, Inc. ("Global"); and (3) Core Communications, Inc. ("Core"). Also before the Court is the

alternative motion of Core to be dropped as a defendant under Federal Rule of Procedure 21. MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc.

("WorldCom"), has intervened to defend the actions of the PSC. The United States of America has also intervened, filing an opposition to the commissioners' motion to dismiss, and asking the Court to reject the commissioners' assertion of sovereign immunity and to defend the constitutionality of the 1996 Act. The issues have been fully briefed by the parties, and no oral hearing is necessary. Local Rule 105.6 (D. Md.). BACKGROUND Congress enacted the 1996 Act to promote competition in local telecommunications markets. See AT & T Corp. v. Iowa Toward that end, the 1996

Utils. Bd., 525 U.S. 366, 371 (1999).

Act imposes various obligations on incumbent local-exchange carriers ("ILECs"), including a duty to share their networks with competing local-exchange carriers ("CLECs"). 251(c). See 47 U.S.C.
Download Verizon Maryland Inc., F/K/A Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc. v. RCN Telecom Service

Maryland Law

Maryland State Laws
Maryland Court
Maryland Tax
Maryland Labor Laws
Maryland Agencies

Comments

Tips