Preview:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Southern Division LAWRENCE WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, et al., Defendants, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is this 4th day of February, 2004, ORDERED that: 1) The United States Postal Service's Motion To Strike Surreply (Paper no. 17) is GRANTED ; 2) The Plaintiff's Motion To Strike Memorandum Opinion Of Chavis v. John E. Potter (Paper no. 18) is DENIED ; 3) The Defendant United States Postal Service's Motion To Dismiss (Paper no. 8) is GRANTED ; 4) The Motion To Dismiss Of Defendant Nation's Capital Southern Maryland Area Local American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO (Paper no. 12) is GRANTED ; 5) 6) This case is DISMISSED ; and The clerk will take all necessary steps to CLOSE this case. /s/ ROGER W. TITUS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Civil Action No. RWT 03-2180



Download Wright v. U.S. Postal Service, et al. (Order).pdf

Maryland Law