Preview:

Headnote Howard Dean Dutton v State of Maryland, No. 1607 September Term, 2003 CRIMINAL LAW - SENTENCING - AMBIGUOUS SENTENCE - ALLEGED AMBIGUITY IN SENTENCE RESOLVED BY REVIEW OF TRANSCRIPT OF IMPOSITION OF THE SENTENCE, THE DOCKET ENTRY, AND THE COMMITMENT ORDER.

REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND

No. 1607 September Term, 2003

HOWARD DEAN DUTTON v. STATE of MARYLAND

Davis, Adkins, Meredith, JJ.

Opinion by Meredith, J.

Filed: December 8, 2004

Howard Dean Dutton appeals from the denial of his motion to correct an allegedly illegal sentence. In that motion, Dutton asserted that, on September 9, 1999, he was already serving two sentences of differing lengths

Download Dutton v. State.pdf

Maryland Law