Preview:

KENNETH M. GOODWICH et al. v. PAUL W. NOLAN et al. NO. 24, SEPTEMBER TERM, 1995 [HEALTH CLAIMS ARBITRATION OFFICE -- MANDAMUS -- MANDAMUS RELIEF IS INAPPROPRIATE DURING AN ONGOING HCAO PROCEEDING INASMUCH AS THE HEALTH CARE MALPRACTICE CLAIMS ACT PROVIDES A FULLY ADEQUATE STATUTORY REMEDY AFTER THE HCAO RENDERS A FINAL DECISION.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND NO. 24 SEPTEMBER TERM, 1995 ___________________________________

KENNETH M. GOODWICH et al. V. PAUL W. NOLAN et al. ___________________________________ Murphy, C. J. Eldridge Rodowsky Chasanow Karwacki Bell Raker JJ. ___________________________________ OPINION BY Bell, J. ___________________________________ FILED: August 5, 1996

This appeal arises from a medical malpractice action filed in the Health Claims Arbitration Office ("HCAO"). See Maryland Code (1973, 1995 Repl. Vol. & Cum. Supp.),

Download Goodwich v. Nolan.pdf

Maryland Law