Preview:

HEADNOTE:

Lurz v. State, No. 2298, September Term, 1999

Md. Rule 4-215 (e): If the trial court finds that there is a meritorious reason for discharge of counsel the defendant is entitled to a postponement. If the trial court finds that there is no meritorious reason, the court may permit the discharge of counsel and, after advising defendant of the possible consequences, require defendant to proceed without counsel. Md. Rules 4-221 (f) (g): State v. Graziano, 71 Md. App. 652, cert. denied, 311 Md. 324 (1987), (g) applies only to the District Court. Health General Article,

Download Lurz v. State.pdf

Maryland Law