Preview:

HEADNOTE DAVID RAU v. BRENDA D. COLLINS, NO. 653, SEPTEMBER TERM, 2005 EASEMENT BY NECESSITY; MICHAEL v. NEEDHAM, 39 MD. APP. 271 (1978); DALTON v. REAL ESTATE AND IMPROVEMENT CO., 201 MD. 34 (1952); BECAUSE THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, A 40 FOOT BY 14 FOOT UNIMPROVED LOT, WAS DERIVED FROM A COMMON GRANTOR AND, BECAUSE THE NECESSITY ASSERTED - APPELLEE'S INABILITY TO ACCESS PARKING PAD AT THE REAR OF HER LOT - DID NOT EXIST THIRTY

Download Rau v. Collins.pdf

Maryland Law