Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Maryland » Maryland Appellate Court » 2005 » Stanley v. Local 553
Stanley v. Local 553
State: Maryland
Court: Court of Appeals
Docket No: 1313/04
Case Date: 10/06/2005
Preview:REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND

No. 1313 September Term, 2004

RAMON STANLEY v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES LOCAL NO. 553, ET AL.

Eyler, Deborah S., Barbera, Wenner, William W., (retired, specially assigned), JJ.

Opinion by Barbera, J.

Filed:

October 6, 2005

This appeal has its genesis in a union's refusal to arbitrate a member's grievance with his employer. In 2000, Ramon Stanley,

appellant, was terminated from his employment with the City of Cumberland after a urine sample he submitted to the Allegany County Health Department (the "Health Department") tested positive for the presence of marijuana. That result was appellant's second positive test result in approximately one year. Appellant, a member of the American Federation of State & Municipal Employees Local No. 553 (the "Union"), sought the Union's assistance in pursuing a grievance on his behalf against the City of Cumberland. The Union's members initially voted to arbitrate

the decision to terminate appellant's employment, but later voted not to proceed on appellant's behalf. The Union notified appellant that he could proceed to arbitration on his own and without Union representation. When appellant attempted to enter into arbitration with the City of Cumberland, however, it refused to arbitrate. Appellant thereafter filed suit in the Circuit Court for Allegany County against the Mayor and the City Council of

Cumberland (the "City") and the Union, all appellees herein. Appellant alleged in the complaint that the Union breached its duty of fair representation, and that he was wrongfully terminated from his employment with the City. Appellant also asked the court to

issue an order compelling the City to arbitrate his grievance. After the court entered summary judgment in favor of

appellees, appellant noted this timely appeal.

For the reasons

discussed below, we hold that there are triable issues concerning appellant's claim for breach of the Union's duty of fair

representation.

We therefore reverse the court's grant of summary We also reverse the court's grant

judgment in favor of the Union.

of summary judgment in favor of the City on the count alleging wrongful termination. We affirm the court's summary judgment

ruling in favor of the City on the counts requesting an order compelling arbitration and an order that the grievance be decided in appellant's favor. Background Appellant began working for the City in October 1974, and had been working as an "Equipment Operator 2" for approximately ten years before his employment was terminated in 2000. Shortly after

he began his employment with the City, appellant became a member of the Union. In 1979, the City designated the Union "the exclusive

bargaining agent for certain employees in the general trades and labor and clerical/technical classifications of the City of

Cumberland[.]" were parties

From July 1, 1998 through June 30, 2001, appellees to a Collective Bargaining Agreement (the

"Agreement").

Article IV,
Download Stanley v. Local 553.pdf

Maryland Law

Maryland State Laws
Maryland Court
Maryland Tax
Maryland Labor Laws
Maryland Agencies

Comments

Tips