Preview:

REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 845 SEPTEMBER TERM, 1994 ___________________________________

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION v. PATRICK J. CALLAHAN, ET AL. ___________________________________ Wilner, CJ. Hollander, Salmon, JJ. ___________________________________ Opinion by Hollander, J. ___________________________________ Filed: May 31, 1995

The common issue presented here concerns the determination of when appellees, who are 33 former Westinghouse Electric Corporation employees, became unemployed for purposes of entitlement to

unemployment compensation benefits.1 Department concluded of that Economic all 33 and

The Hearing Examiner of the Development qualified to ("DEED") collect

Employment were

appellees

unemployment insurance benefits as of the time that they were prospectively notified by Westinghouse, the appellant here, that their jobs would be abolished. Thereafter, pursuant to Md. Code

Ann., Labor and Employment Art. ("L.E.")

Download Westinghouse v. Callahan.pdf

Maryland Law