Preview:

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Opinion
ELLEN M. OSTROTH and THANE OSTROTH, Plaintiffs, and JENNIFER L. HUDOCK and BRIAN D. HUDOCK, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v WARREN REGENCY, G.P., L.L.C., AND WARREN REGENCY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendants, and EDWARD SCHULAK, HOBBS & BLACK, INC., Defendant-Appellant. _______________________________ BEFORE THE ENTIRE BENCH WEAVER, J. This architectural malpractice

Chief Justice:

Justices:

Clifford W. Taylor

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman

FILED FEBRUARY 1, 2006

No. 126859

case

poses

the

issue

whether MCL 600.5839 is only a statute of repose, in which case MCL 600.5805(6) or (10) supplies a shorter limitations period, or is itself both a statute of repose and a statute of limitations. The Court of Appeals concluded that

Download ELLEN M OSTROTH V WARREN REGENCY GP LLC.pdf

Michigan Law