Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Michigan » Court of Appeals » 1997 » IN RE CAREY MINORS
IN RE CAREY MINORS
State: Michigan
Court: Court of Appeals
Docket No: 196371
Case Date: 06/27/1997
Preview:STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS


In the Matter of CHRISTOPHER CAREY, TERREA D. CAREY, and JUSTIN CAREY, Minors. _______________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee, v ALICIA CAREY, Respondent-Appellant. and ANSON YOUNG and LARRY MAYS, Respondents. _______________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee, v MAURICE BROWN, Respondent-Appellant. _______________________________________ Before: Reilly, P.J., and Hood and Murphy, JJ. MEMORANDUM. No. 197197 LC No. 91-017368 NA No. 196371 LC No. 91-017368 NA UNPUBLISHED June 27, 1997

-1

Respondents-appellants appeal as of right from the probate court order terminating their parental rights to the minor children. We affirm. As to respondent Carey, the probate court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i) and (g); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(c)(i) and (g) were established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445 NW2d 161 (1989). Further, respondent-appellant failed to show that termination of her parental rights was clearly not in the children's best interests. In re Hall-Smith, ___ Mich App ___; ___ NW2d ___ (Docket No. 195833, issued March 25, 1997), slip op p 3. Thus, the probate court did not err in terminating respondent-appellant's parental rights to the children. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5). As to respondent Brown, the probate court did not clearly err in finding that there was clear and convincing evidence of desertion for more that 91 days sufficient to terminate his rights under MCL 712A.19b(3)(a)(ii); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(a)(ii). Further, we find no clear error in the probate court's ruling that respondent Brown failed to show that termination was clearly not in his daughter's best interest. Thus, the probate court did not err in terminating respondent Brown's parental rights. In re Hall-Smith, supra. Affirmed. /s/ Maureen Pulte Reilly /s/ Harold Hood /s/ William B. Murphy

-2

Download IN RE CAREY MINORS.pdf

Michigan Law

Michigan State Laws
Michigan Court
Michigan Tax
Michigan Labor Laws
Michigan State
    > Michigan Counties
    > Michigan Zip Codes
Michigan Agencies

Comments

Tips