Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Michigan » Court of Appeals » 1998 » IN RE ESTATE OF DENISE ELLEN AQUINO
IN RE ESTATE OF DENISE ELLEN AQUINO
State: Michigan
Court: Court of Appeals
Docket No: 198576
Case Date: 02/13/1998
Preview:STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS


In the Matter of the Estate of DENISE ELLEN AQUINO, a Legally Incapacitated Person.

ESTATE OF DENISE ELLEN AQUINO,

UNPUBLISHED February 13, 1998

Petitioner-Appellee, v RENATO AQUINO and DENISE ELLEN AQUINO, Individually, Respondents-Appellants. No. 198576 Wayne Probate Court LC No. 93-518528

Before: Markman, P.J., and McDonald and Cavanagh, JJ. PER CURIAM. Respondents Renato and Denise Aquino appeal as of right from the probate court order removing Renato as conservator of Denise's estate. We reverse and remand. Respondents first argue that the probate court lacked jurisdiction to remove Renato as conservator. Whether the probate court had jurisdiction is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. See Oakland Hills Development Corp v Lueders Drainage District , 212 Mich App 284, 294; 537 NW2d 258 (1995). Respondents contend that the probate court did not have jurisdiction because they were not provided with notice and a hearing. Notice must be reasonably calculated to apprise interested parties of the pendency of an action and must afford them an opportunity to present objections. Vicencio v Jaime Ramirez, MD, PC, 211 Mich App 501, 504; 536 NW2d 280 (1995). We conclude that respondents were not given sufficient notice of a challenge to Renato's conservatorship. Although by filing her petition Denise raised the question whether the conservatorship -1

should continue, whether Renato should continue as the conservator is a separate and distinct issue. Renato was not represented by counsel at the August 12, 1996, hearing, and did not have an adequate opportunity to present his objections to his removal as conservator. The failure to provide proper notice constitutes a jurisdictional defect. See In re Williams Estate, 133 Mich App 1, 8; 349 NW2d 247 (1984). Accordingly, we reverse the probate court order removing Renato as conservator and remand for further proceedings. Because of our resolution of the previous issue, it is unnecessary for us to address whether the probate court erred in removing Renato as conservator. Reversed and remanded. We do not retain jurisdiction. /s/ Gary R. McDonald /s/ Mark J. Cavanagh

-2

Download IN RE ESTATE OF DENISE ELLEN AQUINO.pdf

Michigan Law

Michigan State Laws
Michigan Court
Michigan Tax
Michigan Labor Laws
Michigan State
    > Michigan Counties
    > Michigan Zip Codes
Michigan Agencies

Comments

Tips