Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Michigan » Court of Appeals » 2001 » KAREN GIBBS ERNST V MICHAEL ERNST
KAREN GIBBS ERNST V MICHAEL ERNST
State: Michigan
Court: Court of Appeals
Docket No: 220450
Case Date: 05/25/2001
Preview:STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS


KAREN GIBBS ERNST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v MICHAEL ERNST, Defendant-Appellee.

UNPUBLISHED May 25, 2001

No. 220450 Wayne Circuit Court LC No. 98-800750-DM

Before: Jansen, P.J., and Zahra and Owens, JJ. MEMORANDUM. Plaintiff appeals as of right the judgment of divorce entered by the trial court. We affirm. The parties separated in July 1997 under a formal separation agreement. Plaintiff filed a complaint for divorce in January 1998, and moved to enforce the separation agreement. The trial court granted plaintiff's motion. Defendant subsequently moved to modify child support. After conducting a hearing, the trial court found that given defendant's income, the $1,000 per month child support figure contained in the separation agreement shocked the conscience, and ordered support in an amount consistent with the Friend of the Court recommendation. Generally, courts may modify child support payments upon a showing of a change of circumstances. Crego v Coleman, 463 Mich 248, 256; 615 NW2d 218 (2000). As our Supreme Court observed in Crego, supra at 256, the legislature has provided three separate statutory provisions that clearly establish that "child support agreements entered in divorce actions always remain modifiable." See: MCL 552.455(1); MSA 25.222(5)(1), MCL 552.17(1); MSA 25.97(1), and MCL 552.517; MSA 25.176(17). Plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in failing to enforce all the terms of the separation agreement. However, the child support provision in the separation agreement specifically allows for termination of the child support requirement if a court of competent jurisdiction sets the amount of support for the child. The trial court set child support in accord

-1-

with the Friend of the Court recommendation. Where this action is contemplated by the separation agreement, there is no showing that the trial court failed to enforce the agreement. Affirmed. /s/ Kathleen Jansen /s/ Brian K. Zahra /s/ Donald S. Owens

-2-

Download KAREN GIBBS ERNST V MICHAEL ERNST.pdf

Michigan Law

Michigan State Laws
Michigan Court
Michigan Tax
Michigan Labor Laws
Michigan State
    > Michigan Counties
    > Michigan Zip Codes
Michigan Agencies

Comments

Tips