Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Michigan » Court of Appeals » 2005 » LARRY BARNETT V MARVIN BLACHURA
LARRY BARNETT V MARVIN BLACHURA
State: Michigan
Court: Court of Appeals
Docket No: 252642
Case Date: 06/16/2005
Preview:STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS


LARRY BARNETT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v MARVIN BLACHURA and JUDITH BLACHURA, Defendants-Appellants.

UNPUBLISHED June 16, 2005

No. 252642 Oakland Circuit Court LC No. 96-525279-CK

Before: O'Connell, P.J., and Schuette and Borrello, JJ. MEMORANDUM. Defendants appeal by delayed leave granted from the trial court's order setting aside the court's earlier judgment confirming an arbitration award. We reverse and reinstate the judgment confirming the arbitration award.1 This case is being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E). The trial court erred in determining that this case involved a dispute concerning title to real estate and that arbitration was therefore precluded by MCL 600.5005. MCL 600.5005 states, "A submission to arbitration shall not be made respecting the claim of any person to any estate, in fee, or for life, in real estate," except in certain situations not applicable here. Although this action arises from a purchase agreement involving real estate, plaintiff's amended complaint did not assert a "claim . . . to any estate, in fee, or for life, in real estate," id., but rather only sought money damages for breach of contract. Further, the arbitrators did not decide any claim involving an interest in real estate. Therefore, this case is factually distinguishable from McFerren v B&B Investment Group, 233 Mich App 505, 513; 592 NW2d 782 (1999), which, as an action to quiet title, clearly involved a dispute concerning an interest in real estate. Because the case at bar does not involve title to land, the trial court erred in determining that arbitration was precluded by MCL 600.5005.

This is the parties' second appearance before this Court. In Barnett v Blachura, 242 Mich App 395; 618 NW2d 777 (2000), we reversed the trial court's determination that it lacked subjectmatter jurisdiction over this dispute because of bankruptcy proceedings.

1

-1-


Reversed and remanded for reinstatement of the judgment confirming the arbitration award. We do not retain jurisdiction. /s/ Peter D. O'Connell /s/ Bill Schuette /s/ Stephen L. Borrello

-2-


Download LARRY BARNETT V MARVIN BLACHURA.pdf

Michigan Law

Michigan State Laws
Michigan Court
Michigan Tax
Michigan Labor Laws
Michigan State
    > Michigan Counties
    > Michigan Zip Codes
Michigan Agencies

Comments

Tips