Preview:

STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS


PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v CREIGHTON RICHARD MORRISON, Defendant-Appellant.

UNPUBLISHED May 21, 1999

No. 202578 St Clair Circuit Court LC No. 96-002204 FC

Before: Griffin, P.J., and Cavanagh and Fitzgerald, JJ. MEMORANDUM. Defendant appeals by right his plea-based conviction for assault with intent to commit second degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520g(2); MSA 28.788(7)(2). We affirm. This appeal is being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E). Defendant asserts without specificity that his sentence was based on inaccurate information. Defendant has failed to preserve this issue for appellate review. The plain language of MCL 771.14(5); MSA 28.1144(5) and MCR 6.425(D)(2)(b) require a defendant to challenge the accuracy of any information contained in the presentence investigation report at the time of sentencing. This Court has declined to allow postsentencing preservation of issues concerning the accuracy of presentencing information in light of the statutory language. People v Sharp, 192 Mich App 501, 504; 481 NW2d 773 (1992). Where defendant has failed to even identify what information in the presentence report is inaccurate, he has presented no basis on which this Court could review his claim. Affirmed. /s/ Richard Allen Griffin /s/ Mark J. Cavanagh /s/ E. Thomas Fitzgerald

-1



Download PEOPLE OF MI V CREIGHTON RICHARD MORRISON.pdf

Michigan Law