Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Michigan » Court of Appeals » 2006 » PEOPLE OF MI V KERMIT ELDRIDGE HAYNES
PEOPLE OF MI V KERMIT ELDRIDGE HAYNES
State: Michigan
Court: Court of Appeals
Docket No: 256745
Case Date: 01/17/2006
Preview:STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS


PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
V

UNPUBLISHED January 17, 2006

KERMIT ELDRIDGE HAYNES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 256745 Wayne Circuit Court LC No. 90-002571-01

Before: O'Connell, P.J., and Smolenski and Talbot, JJ. MEMORANDUM. Defendant pleaded nolo contendere to second-degree murder, MCL 750.317, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony (felony-firearm), MCL 750.227b, in exchange for consecutive terms of imprisonment of two years for felony-firearm, and twenty to thirty years for murder, and the dropping of a charge of first-degree murder, MCL 750.316. Defendant appeals as of right,1 challenging only his felony-firearm conviction. We affirm. This appeal is being decided without oral argument in accordance with MCR 7.214(E). Defendant pleaded guilty to first-degree murder, assault with intent to rob while armed, and felony-firearm, in connection with the same incident underlying this appeal. The trial court sentenced him as a juvenile, but on appeal this Court remanded for resentencing as an adult. People v Haynes, 199 Mich App 593; 502 NW2d 758 (1993). This Court also concluded, sua sponte, that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to convict defendant of felony-firearm, and so vacated that conviction. Id. at 603-604. Before resentencing, defendant moved to withdraw his plea on the ground that it was not offered knowingly and voluntarily, citing ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court granted the motion, but this Court reversed. People v Haynes (After Remand), 221 Mich App 551, 554-556; 562 NW2d 241 (1997). Defendant ultimately persuaded a federal court, on a writ of habeas corpus, to order him retried or released. Haynes v Burke, 115 F Supp 2d 813 (ED Mich, 2000), aff'd sub nom Miller v Straub, 299 F3d 570 (CA 6, 2002).

1

Defendant is claiming an appeal, rather than seeking leave, because this case arises from conduct and proceedings taking place before the 1994 amendment of Const 1963, art 1,
Download PEOPLE OF MI V KERMIT ELDRIDGE HAYNES.pdf

Michigan Law

Michigan State Laws
Michigan Court
Michigan Tax
Michigan Labor Laws
Michigan State
    > Michigan Counties
    > Michigan Zip Codes
Michigan Agencies

Comments

Tips