Preview:

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A07-1622 Wilkin County State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Daniel Leonard Anderson, Appellant. ________________________ Filed: March 26, 2009 Office of Appellate Courts Gildea, J.

Lawrence Hammerling, Chief State Appellate Public Defender, Suzanne M. Senecal-Hill, Assistant State Public Defender, St. Paul, Minnesota, for appellant. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, John B. Galus, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota; and Timothy E.J. Fox, Wilkin County Attorney, Breckenridge, Minnesota, for respondent. ________________________

SYLLABUS 1. The district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of a

prior domestic abuse incident between appellant and the victims mother, and any error in the admission of testimony about incidents with appellants former girlfriend and appellants brother was harmless.

1

2.

Appellants pro se claims are waived because no error is obvious upon

inspection of the claims, and because appellant failed to provide argument or legal authority for his pro se claims. Affirmed. OPINION GILDEA, Justice. On May 25, 2007, a Wilkin County jury found appellant Daniel Leonard Anderson (Anderson) guilty of first-degree murder while committing domestic abuse, Minn. Stat.

Download A07-1622, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Daniel Leonard Anderson, Appellant

Minnesota Law