Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Minnesota » Court of Appeals » 2010 » A08-2060, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Carlos Darell Dickerson, Appellant.
A08-2060, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Carlos Darell Dickerson, Appellant.
State: Minnesota
Court: Court of Appeals
Docket No: A08-2060
Case Date: 03/30/2010
Preview:STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A08-2060 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Carlos Darell Dickerson, Appellant. Filed January 19, 2010 Affirmed Kalitowski, Judge Ramsey County District Court File No. 62-K5-06-004705 Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota; and Susan Gaertner, Ramsey County Attorney, Mitchell L. Rothman, Assistant County Attorney, St. Paul, Minnesota (for respondent) Marie L. Wolf, Interim Chief Appellate Public Defender, Michael W. Kunkel, Assistant Public Defender, St. Paul, Minnesota (for appellant) Considered and decided by Hudson, Presiding Judge; Kalitowski, Judge; and Stauber, Judge. SYLLABUS A writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum does not constitute a detainer for purposes of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, and the Interstate Agreement on Detainers does not apply in the absence of a detainer.

OPINION KALITOWSKI, Judge On appeal from the district courts denial of his postconviction petition, appellant Carlos Darell Dickerson contends that the district court erred by determining that: (1) the Interstate Agreement on Detainers did not apply here; and (2) appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to assert the protections of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers. FACTS On December 15, 2006, the state charged appellant Carlos Darell Dickerson with one count of first-degree assault in violation of Minn. Stat.
Download A08-2060, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Carlos Darell Dickerson, Appellant

Minnesota Law

Minnesota State Laws
Minnesota Tax
Minnesota Labor Laws
Minnesota Court
Minnesota Agencies
    > Minnesota DMV

Comments

Tips