Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Minnesota » Court of Appeals » 2009 » A08-607, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Joseph V. Hollins, Appellant.
A08-607, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Joseph V. Hollins, Appellant.
State: Minnesota
Court: Court of Appeals
Docket No: A08-607
Case Date: 06/30/2009
Preview:STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A08-0607 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Joseph V. Hollins, Appellant. Filed May 12, 2009 Affirmed Poritsky, Judge* Olmsted County District Court File No. K5-05-1108 Lori Swanson, Attorney General, John B. Galus, Assistant Attorney General, 1800 Bremer Tower, 445 Minnesota Street, St. Paul, MN 55101; and Mark A. Ostrem, Olmsted County Attorney, Third Floor Olmsted County Courthouse, 151 Fourth Street Southeast, Rochester, MN 55904 (for respondent) Lawrence Hammerling, Chief Appellate Public Defender, Roy G. Spurbeck, Assistant Public Defender, 540 Fairview Avenue North, Suite 300, St. Paul, MN 55104 (for appellant) Considered and decided by Stoneburner, Presiding Judge; Shumaker, Judge; and Poritsky, Judge. SYLLABUS Evidence of an uncharged crime is intrinsic to the charged crime and therefore admissible without regard to Minn. R. Evid. 404 if (1) the uncharged crime arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions as the charged crime and (2) either (a) the
*

Retired judge of the district court, serving as judge of the Minnesota Court of Appeals by appointment pursuant to Minn. Const. art. VI,
Download A08-607, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Joseph V. Hollins, Appellant..pdf

Minnesota Law

Minnesota State Laws
Minnesota Tax
Minnesota Labor Laws
Minnesota Court
Minnesota Agencies
    > Minnesota DMV

Comments

Tips