Preview:

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A08-929

Court of Appeals

Gildea, J.

Day Masonry, Appellant, vs. Independent School District 347, Respondent, Commercial Roofing, Inc., Appellant, GenFlex Roofing Systems, LLP, Appellant, Lovering-Johnson Construction, Appellant. ________________________ William A. Moeller, Blethen, Gage & Krause, PLLP, Mankato, Minnesota, for appellant Day Masonry. Amy E. Mace, Christian R. Shafer, Ratwik, Roszak & Maloney, PA, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondent Independent School District 347. William M. Drinane, Timothy S. Poeschl, Hanson, Lulic, & Krall, LLC, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and 1 Filed: April 15, 2010 Office of Appellate Courts

Chad McKenney, Donohue, McKenney, & Bergquist, Ltd., Maple Grove, Minnesota, for appellant Commercial Roofing, Inc. Michael S. Kreidler, Louise A. Behrendt, Stich, Angell, Kreidler & Dodge, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for appellant GenFlex Roofing Systems, LLP. Mark S. Brown, Timothy J. Carrigan, Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for appellant Lovering-Johnson Construction. _______________________ SYLLABUS 1. Because the earliest respondent School Districts warranty claims could

have accrued was December 2004, the two-year statute of limitations found in Minn. Stat.

Download A08-929, Day Masonry, Appellant, vs. Independent School District 347, Respondent

Minnesota Law