Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Minnesota » Court of Appeals » 2010 » A09-1501, Trisha Geist-Miller, Appellant, vs. Ronald Mitchell, et al., Respondents.
A09-1501, Trisha Geist-Miller, Appellant, vs. Ronald Mitchell, et al., Respondents.
State: Minnesota
Court: Court of Appeals
Docket No: A09-1501
Case Date: 06/29/2010
Preview:STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A09-1501 Trisha Geist-Miller, Appellant, vs. Ronald Mitchell, et al., Respondents. Filed June 1, 2010 Affirmed Crippen, Judge Olmsted County District Court File No. 55-C0-05-2702

Robert D. Boedigheimer, St. Paul, Minnesota (for appellant) James R. Andreen, Minneapolis, Minnesota (for respondents)

Considered and decided by Shumaker, Presiding Judge; Klaphake, Judge; and Crippen, Judge. SYLLABUS 1. The district court errs by weighing evidence or making credibility

determinations in deciding a summary-judgment motion. The defendant is not entitled to summary judgment when the plaintiffs evidence, if fully believed, would support a claim for relief.



Retired judge of the Minnesota Court of Appeals, serving by appointment pursuant to Minn. Const. art. VI,
Download A09-1501, Trisha Geist-Miller, Appellant, vs. Ronald Mitchell, et al., Responden

Minnesota Law

Minnesota State Laws
Minnesota Tax
Minnesota Labor Laws
Minnesota Court
Minnesota Agencies
    > Minnesota DMV

Comments

Tips