Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Minnesota » Supreme Court » 2010 » A09-1728, Mary Lickteig, Plaintiff/Appellant, vs. Robert Kolar, Jr., Defendant/Appellee.
A09-1728, Mary Lickteig, Plaintiff/Appellant, vs. Robert Kolar, Jr., Defendant/Appellee.
State: Minnesota
Court: Supreme Court
Docket No: A09-1728, Mary Lickteig, Plaintiff/Appellant,
Case Date: 06/30/2010
Preview:STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A09-1728

Certified Question U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Magnuson, C.J.

Mary Lickteig, Plaintiff/Appellant, vs. Robert Kolar, Jr., Defendant/Appellee. ________________________ Richard D. Casey, Ryland L. Deinert, Dana Van Beek Palmer, Lynn, Jackson, Shultz & Lebrun, P.C., Sioux Falls, South Dakota, for appellant. John E. Mack, Mack & Daby, P.A., New London, Minnesota, for appellee. ________________________ SYLLABUS 1. A cause of action based on sexual abuse does not exist under Minnesota Filed: May 27, 2010 Office of Appellate Courts

law apart from common-law tort, although such common-law tort claims may arise from "sexual abuse" as defined by Minn. Stat.
Download A09-1728, Mary Lickteig, Plaintiff/Appellant, vs. Robert Kolar, Jr., Defendant/A

Minnesota Law

Minnesota State Laws
Minnesota Tax
Minnesota Labor Laws
Minnesota Court
Minnesota Agencies
    > Minnesota DMV

Comments

Tips