A09-81, Minneapolis Police Department, Relator, vs. Phillip Kelly, Respondent, City of Minneapolis, Commission on Civil Rights, Respondent.

State: Minnesota

Court: Court of Appeals

Docket No: A09-81

Case Date: 03/30/2010

Preview:STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A09-81 Minneapolis Police Department, Relator, vs. Phillip Kelly, Respondent, City of Minneapolis, Commission on Civil Rights, Respondent. Filed January 12, 2010 Affirmed Minge, Judge Dissenting, Harten, Judge* Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights File No. A4169-PS-1 Susan L. Segal, Minneapolis City Attorney, Timothy S. Skarda, Assistant City Attorney, Minneapolis, MN (for relator) William L. Walker, Walker Law Offices, P.A., Minneapolis, MN (for respondent Kelly) Considered and decided by Minge, Presiding Judge; Schellhas, Judge; and Harten, Judge. SYLLABUS The test for determining unfair racial discrimination under the public-services provision of the Minneapolis human-rights ordinance is set forth in City of Minneapolis v. Richardson, 307 Minn. 80, 239 N.W.2d 197 (1976) (applying state human-rights act) and
*

Retired judge of the Minnesota Court of Appeals, serving by appointment pursuant to Minn. Const. art. VI,

Download A09-81, Minneapolis Police Department, Relator, vs. Phillip Kelly, Respondent, C