A10-1001, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Kim Douglass Barsness, Appellant.

SUPREME COURT CASES

Laws-info.com » Cases » Minnesota » Court of Appeals » 2011 » A10-1001, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Kim Douglass Barsness, Appellant.

A10-1001, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Kim Douglass Barsness, Appellant.

State: Minnesota

Court: Court of Appeals

Docket No: A10-1001

Case Date: 06/28/2011

Preview:STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-1001 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Kim Douglass Barsness, Appellant. Filed April 12, 2011 Reversed Larkin, Judge Beltrami County District Court File No. 04-CR-09-3962

Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota; and Timothy R. Faver, Beltrami County Attorney, Randall R. Burg, Assistant County Attorney, Bemidji, Minnesota (for respondent) Mark D. Nyvold, St. Paul, Minnesota (for appellant)

Considered and decided by Minge, Presiding Judge; Klaphake, Judge; and Larkin, Judge. SYLLABUS To establish a violation of Minn. Stat.

Download A10-1001, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Kim Douglass Barsness, Appellant..

Minnesota Law

Minnesota State Laws

> Minnesota Child Support

> Minnesota Child Support Online

> Minnesota Gun Law

> Minnesota State Tax

> Minnesota Statute

Minnesota Tax

> Minnesota State Tax

Minnesota Labor Laws

> Minnesota Unemployment Benefits

Minnesota Court

> Minnesota Court Records

> Near v. Minnesota

Minnesota Agencies

> Miinnesota Department of Health

> Minnesota Department of Corrections

> Minnesota Department of Education

> Minnesota Department of Revenue

> Minnesota Department of Transportation

> Minnesota DMV

> Minnesota Secretary of State

Comments

Popular In Supreme Court Cases

Escobedo V Illinois Barron V Baltimore Brandenburg V Ohio John Wayne Gacy Marbury V Madison Miranda Arizona New Jersey V Tlo Famous Child Abuse Cases Richard Ramirez Gregg V Georgia Edwards V Aguillard Brown V Board Of Education

Tips