Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Minnesota » Supreme Court » 2011 » A10-1909, Darwin Stately, Relator, vs. Red Lake Builders and GAB Robins North America, Inc., Respondents, and MeritCare Health System, Central Minnesota Neurosciences, Ltd. and Center for Pain Managem
A10-1909, Darwin Stately, Relator, vs. Red Lake Builders and GAB Robins North America, Inc., Respondents, and MeritCare Health System, Central Minnesota Neurosciences, Ltd. and Center for Pain Managem
State: Minnesota
Court: Supreme Court
Docket No: A10-1909, Darwin Stately, Relator, vs. Red Lak
Case Date: 03/30/2011
Preview:STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A10-1909

Darwin Stately, Relator, vs. Red Lake Builders and GAB Robins North America, Inc., Respondents, and MeritCare Health System, Central Minnesota Neurosciences, Ltd. and Center for Pain Management, P.A., Intervenors.

________________________________

Yuri Jelokov, Rodgers, Garbow & Jelokov, P.L.L.C., Bemidji, Minnesota, for relator. Michael Forde, Andrew M. Grimsrud, Aafedt, Gray, Monson & Hager, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents. _______________________________

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

1

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 30, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case). Dated: March 1, 2011 BY THE COURT:

/s/ David R. Stras Associate Justice

2

Download A10-1909, Darwin Stately, Relator, vs. Red Lake Builders and GAB Robins North Am

Minnesota Law

Minnesota State Laws
Minnesota Tax
Minnesota Labor Laws
Minnesota Court
Minnesota Agencies
    > Minnesota DMV

Comments

Tips