Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Minnesota » Supreme Court » 2012 » A10-392, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Herman Tanksley, Jr., Appellant.
A10-392, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Herman Tanksley, Jr., Appellant.
State: Minnesota
Court: Supreme Court
Docket No: A10-392
Case Date: 03/28/2012
Preview:STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A10-0392

Court of Appeals State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Herman Tanksley, Jr., Appellant. ________________________ Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota; and

Stras, J.

Filed: February 8, 2012 Office of Appellate Courts

Susan L. Segal, Minneapolis City Attorney, Jennifer Saunders, Assistant City Attorney, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondent. William M. Ward, Chief Public Defender, Paul J. Maravigli, Assistant Public Defender, Office of the Hennepin County Public Defender, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for appellant. ________________________ SYLLABUS Evidence that a first-void urine sample does not provide a reliable correlation to blood alcohol concentration is not relevant to the offense of driving with an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more, Minn. Stat.
Download A10-392, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Herman Tanksley, Jr., Appellant..pd

Minnesota Law

Minnesota State Laws
Minnesota Tax
Minnesota Labor Laws
Minnesota Court
Minnesota Agencies
    > Minnesota DMV

Comments

Tips