Preview:

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-583 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jasper Allen Pegel, Appellant. Filed March 8, 2011 Affirmed Peterson, Judge Lyon County District Court File No. 42-CR-09-858 Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota; and Richard Robert Maes, Lyon County Attorney, Marshall, Minnesota (for respondent) David W. Merchant, Chief Appellate Public Defender, Cathryn Young Middlebrook, Assistant Public Defender, St. Paul, Minnesota (for appellant)

Considered and decided by Worke, Presiding Judge; Peterson, Judge; and Shumaker, Judge. SYLLABUS A district court's failure to address all of the Trog factors on the record does not demonstrate that the district court abused its discretion by refusing to order a dispositional departure from the presumptive sentence.

OPINION PETERSON, Judge In this appeal from a 144-month presumptive sentence for first-degree criminal sexual conduct, appellant argues that the district court abused its discretion when it denied his motion for a dispositional departure without making a ruling on the record addressing all of the Trog factors. We affirm. FACTS Appellant Jasper Allen Pegel was charged by complaint with four counts of firstdegree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn. Stat.

Download A10-583, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jasper Allen Pegel, Appellant..pdf

Minnesota Law