Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Minnesota » Court of Appeals » 2011 » A10-645, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Wanda May Burdick, Appellant.
A10-645, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Wanda May Burdick, Appellant.
State: Minnesota
Court: Court of Appeals
Docket No: A10-645
Case Date: 03/29/2011
Preview:STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-645 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Wanda May Burdick, Appellant. Filed March 15, 2011 Reversed and remanded Minge, Judge Anoka County District Court File No. 02-CR-09-5978 Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota; and Dawn Speltz, Assistant Spring Lake Park City Attorney, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota (for respondent) David W. Merchant, Chief Appellate Public Defender, St. Paul, Minnesota (for appellant) Considered and decided by Minge, Presiding Judge; Kalitowski, Judge; and Huspeni, Judge.* SYLLABUS A conviction based upon a stipulation pursuant to Minn. R. Crim. P. 26.01, subd. 4, is invalid if the parties fail to acknowledge, and the record does not indicate, that the preserved pretrial ruling is dispositive of the case or, if reversed on appeal, would make a contested trial unnecessary.

*

Retired judge of the Minnesota Court of Appeals, serving by appointment pursuant to Minn. Const. art. VI,
Download A10-645, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Wanda May Burdick, Appellant..pdf

Minnesota Law

Minnesota State Laws
Minnesota Tax
Minnesota Labor Laws
Minnesota Court
Minnesota Agencies
    > Minnesota DMV

Comments

Tips