Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Minnesota » Court of Appeals » 2011 » A10-663, Robert Daniel Anderson, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent.
A10-663, Robert Daniel Anderson, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent.
State: Minnesota
Court: Court of Appeals
Docket No: A10-663
Case Date: 03/29/2011
Preview:STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-663

Robert Daniel Anderson, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent.

Filed February 8, 2011 Affirmed Crippen, Judge Ramsey County District Court File No. 62-K0-07-001110 David W. Merchant, Chief Appellate Public Defender, Andrea G. M. Barts, Assistant Public Defender, St. Paul, Minnesota (for appellant) Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota; and Mark A. Ostrem, Olmsted County Attorney, Eric M. Woodford, Assistant County Attorney, Rochester, Minnesota (for respondent) Considered and decided by Wright, Presiding Judge; Larkin, Judge; and Crippen, Judge. SYLLABUS Because statutory law specifically demands a minimum of $1,000 restitution for identity theft victims, the process is independent of general restitution statutes that



Retired judge of the Minnesota Court of Appeals, serving by appointment pursuant to Minn. Const. art. VI,
Download A10-663, Robert Daniel Anderson, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota,

Minnesota Law

Minnesota State Laws
Minnesota Tax
Minnesota Labor Laws
Minnesota Court
Minnesota Agencies
    > Minnesota DMV

Comments

Tips