Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Minnesota » Court of Appeals » 2012 » A11-1713, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Eric James Hunter, Appellant.
A11-1713, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Eric James Hunter, Appellant.
State: Minnesota
Court: Court of Appeals
Docket No: A11-1713
Case Date: 07/02/2012
Preview:STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A11-1713 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Eric James Hunter, Appellant. Filed July 2, 2012 Affirmed Ross, Judge Dakota County District Court File No. 19HA-CR-09-3627 Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota; and James C. Backstrom, Dakota County Attorney, Kevin J. Golden, Assistant County Attorney, Hastings, Minnesota (for respondent) Peter B. Wold, Aaron J. Morrison, Peter B. Wold, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota (for appellant)

Considered and decided by Wright, Presiding Judge; Ross, Judge; and Muehlberg, Judge. SYLLABUS Whether a defendant has consented to the declaration of a mistrial is a factual question to be decided by the district court, reviewable on appeal for clear error.

Retired judge of the district court, serving as judge of the Minnesota Court of Appeals by appointment pursuant to Minn. Const. art. VI,
Download A11-1713, State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Eric James Hunter, Appellant..pdf

Minnesota Law

Minnesota State Laws
Minnesota Tax
Minnesota Labor Laws
Minnesota Court
Minnesota Agencies
    > Minnesota DMV

Comments

Tips