Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Minnesota » Court of Appeals » 2012 » A11-1746, Jeanine M. Barker, et al., Appellants, vs. County of Lyon, et al., Respondents.
A11-1746, Jeanine M. Barker, et al., Appellants, vs. County of Lyon, et al., Respondents.
State: Minnesota
Court: Court of Appeals
Docket No: A11-1746
Case Date: 06/27/2012
Preview:STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A11-1746 Jeanine M. Barker, et al., Appellants, vs. County of Lyon, et al., Respondents. Filed May 7, 2012 Affirmed Harten, Judge Lyon County District Court File No. 42-CV-09-698

Gregg M. Corwin, Cristina Parra Herrera, Gregg M. Corwin & Associate, Minneapolis, Minnesota (for appellants) Ann R. Goering, Ratwik, Roszak & Maloney, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota (for respondents) Considered and decided by Rodenberg, Presiding Judge; Ross, Judge; and Harten, Judge. SYLLABUS 1. When an employer's policy manual includes a provision reserving to the

employer the right to alter or eliminate provisions in the manual, an employee's continuing reliance on any provision is unreasonable as a matter of law.



Retired judge of the Minnesota Court of Appeals, serving by appointment pursuant to Minn. Const. art. VI,
Download A11-1746, Jeanine M. Barker, et al., Appellants, vs. County of Lyon, et al., Res

Minnesota Law

Minnesota State Laws
Minnesota Tax
Minnesota Labor Laws
Minnesota Court
Minnesota Agencies
    > Minnesota DMV

Comments

Tips