Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Minnesota » Court of Appeals » 2011 » A11-329, Robert G. Dimke, et al., Appellants, vs. Naomi Farr, et al., Respondents, Jon Muir, Respondent.
A11-329, Robert G. Dimke, et al., Appellants, vs. Naomi Farr, et al., Respondents, Jon Muir, Respondent.
State: Minnesota
Court: Court of Appeals
Docket No: A11-329
Case Date: 09/26/2011
Preview:STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A11-329 Robert G. Dimke, et al., Appellants, vs. Naomi Farr, et al., Respondents, Jon Muir, Respondent. Filed September 12, 2011 Reversed and remanded Wright, Judge Cass County District Court File No. 11-CV-10-2382 Eric J. Nystrom, Meghan M. Elliott, Lindquist & Vennum, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, Minnesota (for appellants) John M. Koneck, Peter J. Diessner, Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota (for respondents Farr, et al.) Robert H. Wenner, Reichert Wenner, P.A., St. Cloud, Minnesota (for respondent Muir) Considered and decided by Larkin, Presiding Judge; Shumaker, Judge; and Wright, Judge. SYLLABUS An "unfulfilled condition" of a purchase agreement is a threshold requirement that permits a buyer or a seller to invoke declaratory cancellation of a purchase agreement for residential real property under Minn. Stat.
Download A11-329, Robert G. Dimke, et al., Appellants, vs. Naomi Farr, et al., Respondent

Minnesota Law

Minnesota State Laws
Minnesota Tax
Minnesota Labor Laws
Minnesota Court
Minnesota Agencies
    > Minnesota DMV

Comments

Tips